<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for mpgmotors.com Blog</title>
	<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog</link>
	<description>The MPG Motors Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Hyosung GV250 Aquila by Badi Galinkin</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/02/01/the-hyosung-gv250-aquila/#comment-89</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/02/01/the-hyosung-gv250-aquila/#comment-89</guid>
					<description>I bought this bike after much research on the net and in person.  It's been called the best kept secret, a 400cc in a 250 body amoung other things.  They are right on the money!  This bike will roll sweetly in town and on the highway.  I get looks lots of looks and questions all good and many going it's only a 250?  I say yeah but it goes like the 500 I looked at.  I've been on and looked at the big cc bikes and I'm happy with how this one performs.  Over all bottom line it's an awesome bike that looks great is afordable and a whole lot of fun!  Even makes communting to work fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this bike after much research on the net and in person.  It&#8217;s been called the best kept secret, a 400cc in a 250 body amoung other things.  They are right on the money!  This bike will roll sweetly in town and on the highway.  I get looks lots of looks and questions all good and many going it&#8217;s only a 250?  I say yeah but it goes like the 500 I looked at.  I&#8217;ve been on and looked at the big cc bikes and I&#8217;m happy with how this one performs.  Over all bottom line it&#8217;s an awesome bike that looks great is afordable and a whole lot of fun!  Even makes communting to work fun!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Here&#8217;s the windup and here&#8217;s the Pitch by Hyosung 30th anniversy edition Gv650 - Sportbikes.net</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/29/heres-the-windup-and-heres-the-pitch/#comment-31</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/29/heres-the-windup-and-heres-the-pitch/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>[...] Heres a link to a article I looked up that had some numbers on the GV650.I guess I need to retract my statement of the Vrod blowing the Hyosung into the weeds, a 12.75 1/4 mile ET to a 12.26 for a Night Rod would come down to the rider.I ride with a few big bore cruisers like VTX 1800, M109,street rod which is a breathed on version of the vrod with some Screamin Eagle upgrades and let me tell you they are in a whole other leauge from the GV650.I give props to hyosung though this bike is sort of like the Honda Magna 750 a sleeper that will surprise you in the stop light drags.Oh yeah the link mpgmotors.com Blog » Here&amp;#8217;s the windup and here&amp;#8217;s the Pitch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Heres a link to a article I looked up that had some numbers on the GV650.I guess I need to retract my statement of the Vrod blowing the Hyosung into the weeds, a 12.75 1/4 mile ET to a 12.26 for a Night Rod would come down to the rider.I ride with a few big bore cruisers like VTX 1800, M109,street rod which is a breathed on version of the vrod with some Screamin Eagle upgrades and let me tell you they are in a whole other leauge from the GV650.I give props to hyosung though this bike is sort of like the Honda Magna 750 a sleeper that will surprise you in the stop light drags.Oh yeah the link mpgmotors.com Blog » Here&#8217;s the windup and here&#8217;s the Pitch [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Hyosung GV250 Aquila by Jason Rakowski</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/02/01/the-hyosung-gv250-aquila/#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/02/01/the-hyosung-gv250-aquila/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you.

Jason Rakowski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
<p>Jason Rakowski
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brotherly Love by C-lo</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/caption-help-wanted/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/caption-help-wanted/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>If it were an suv, you would say &quot;carry more people per square foot, AND everyone gets the window seat. 

Since it is a truck you say &quot;no one gets the middle seat&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were an suv, you would say &#8220;carry more people per square foot, AND everyone gets the window seat. </p>
<p>Since it is a truck you say &#8220;no one gets the middle seat&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brotherly Love by Mark</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/caption-help-wanted/#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/caption-help-wanted/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>Brotherly Love</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brotherly Love
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second car? First bike! by skadamo</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/second-car-first-bike/#comment-10</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/second-car-first-bike/#comment-10</guid>
					<description>never heard of the buddy.  I will check it out.  Great Article.  

Saw the tRex at my local shop. Awsome machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never heard of the buddy.  I will check it out.  Great Article.  </p>
<p>Saw the tRex at my local shop. Awsome machine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electric Bicycles - Illegal in Pennsylvania! by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2007/12/18/electric-bikes-illegal-in-pennsylvania-at-this-time/#comment-9</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2007/12/18/electric-bikes-illegal-in-pennsylvania-at-this-time/#comment-9</guid>
					<description>I actually talked with the country sales manager for Vectrix yesterday, we're going to talk some more. It looks like a quality product. I'd be really excited if it cost a lot less but the price will probably come down quickly either from volume or competition.

Eco-Moto in Salt Lake is a Vectric dealer and I'm going to catch up with them and see how they are doing.

Thanks!

note: obxbiker hails from http://www.prideinwhatyouride.com/ a website and forum dedicated to cruisers like the Hyosung GV650, GV250 and others. Check it out! Good ppl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually talked with the country sales manager for Vectrix yesterday, we&#8217;re going to talk some more. It looks like a quality product. I&#8217;d be really excited if it cost a lot less but the price will probably come down quickly either from volume or competition.</p>
<p>Eco-Moto in Salt Lake is a Vectric dealer and I&#8217;m going to catch up with them and see how they are doing.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>note: obxbiker hails from <a href='http://www.prideinwhatyouride.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.prideinwhatyouride.com/</a> a website and forum dedicated to cruisers like the Hyosung GV650, GV250 and others. Check it out! Good ppl.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electric Bicycles - Illegal in Pennsylvania! by obxbiker</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2007/12/18/electric-bikes-illegal-in-pennsylvania-at-this-time/#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2007/12/18/electric-bikes-illegal-in-pennsylvania-at-this-time/#comment-8</guid>
					<description>What about the Vectrix ??

''Newsday has reported that the 36,000 officer-strong NYPD will test four electric Vectrix scooters early next month.

The Vectrix vehicles are capable of a maximum speed of 60 mph, and traveling for 40 to 60 miles before requiring a recharge.''</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the Vectrix ??</p>
<p>&#8216;&#8217;Newsday has reported that the 36,000 officer-strong NYPD will test four electric Vectrix scooters early next month.</p>
<p>The Vectrix vehicles are capable of a maximum speed of 60 mph, and traveling for 40 to 60 miles before requiring a recharge.'&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second car? First bike! by obxbiker</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/second-car-first-bike/#comment-7</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2008/01/16/second-car-first-bike/#comment-7</guid>
					<description>Ecellent VIDEO !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ecellent VIDEO !!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electric Bicycles - Illegal in Pennsylvania! by James Wood</title>
		<link>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2007/12/18/electric-bikes-illegal-in-pennsylvania-at-this-time/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mpgmotors.com/blog/2007/12/18/electric-bikes-illegal-in-pennsylvania-at-this-time/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Submitted to PA DEP Newsletter as editorial.

Despite a great deal of talk on the political front, initiatives extended years ago by the Federal Government and Legislature regarding steps that can be taken to promote energy conservation and reduce air pollution go unheeded at the state level. This failure may be laid at the feet of local legislators, but is also often due to failure on the part of numerous state agencies to coordinate efforts in a pro-active manner to seize opportunities opened up by action at the Federal level. 

A specific example of this is US Public Law 107-319. Passed overwhelmingly by the House and unanimously by the Senate, This law transferred the jurisdiction for regulation of low power electric bicycles from the U.S. Department of Transportation to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, declaring them to be, in the eyes of the Federal government, consumer products, not motor vehicles. The purpose of this was to encourage the states to amend their local laws to permit the use of these on public roads, or alternatively, to simple accept the new definition of electric bicycles as described in PL107-319 and cease to regulation them as motor vehicles. 

The Federal law did not place restrictions on the form of electric bicycles. This was left for the market to evolve in response to technological development within the strict definitions laid out by the Consumer Product Safety Commission in 16CFR Part 1512, the section dealing with safety for vehicles of this type. In its explanation of the need for this legislation, Congress stated, â€śElectric bicycles are in use worldwide, with the market rapidly evolving over the last several years. Electric bicycles generate no pollution, are almost silent, and can greatly increase the recreational and transportation options for commuters.â€ť

A number of major states, including California, Florida, and Texas, immediately acted on this opportunity, passing legislation to specifically permit the use of CPSC Compliant electric bicycles on state and municipal roadways. The New England States have generally accepted the Federal rules without passing new laws, choosing to simply harmonize with the Federal definition of electric bicycles as consumer products not subject to the departments of transportation in a manner other than as bicycles. Vermont was the first to do so in 2003. 

The Middle Atlantic States, however, have essentially blocked the implementation of the Federal law, either by inaction or outright refusal to harmonize their laws in accordance with the stated will of Congress, continuing to regulate them as motor vehicles, despite the Federal intent, i.e.,

SEC. 38. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, low-speed electric bicycles are consumer products within the meaning of section 3(a)(1) and shall be subject to the Commission regulations published at section 1500.18(a)(12) and part 1512 of title 16, Code of Federal Regulations.
(b) For the purpose of this section, the term `low-speed electric bicycle' means a two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a motor while ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph.

The solution to reducing consumption of fossil fuels, thereby reducing pollution, cannot rely on a single initiative. It will be found in the sum total of all that can be undertaken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Submitted to PA DEP Newsletter as editorial.</p>
<p>Despite a great deal of talk on the political front, initiatives extended years ago by the Federal Government and Legislature regarding steps that can be taken to promote energy conservation and reduce air pollution go unheeded at the state level. This failure may be laid at the feet of local legislators, but is also often due to failure on the part of numerous state agencies to coordinate efforts in a pro-active manner to seize opportunities opened up by action at the Federal level. </p>
<p>A specific example of this is US Public Law 107-319. Passed overwhelmingly by the House and unanimously by the Senate, This law transferred the jurisdiction for regulation of low power electric bicycles from the U.S. Department of Transportation to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, declaring them to be, in the eyes of the Federal government, consumer products, not motor vehicles. The purpose of this was to encourage the states to amend their local laws to permit the use of these on public roads, or alternatively, to simple accept the new definition of electric bicycles as described in PL107-319 and cease to regulation them as motor vehicles. </p>
<p>The Federal law did not place restrictions on the form of electric bicycles. This was left for the market to evolve in response to technological development within the strict definitions laid out by the Consumer Product Safety Commission in 16CFR Part 1512, the section dealing with safety for vehicles of this type. In its explanation of the need for this legislation, Congress stated, â€śElectric bicycles are in use worldwide, with the market rapidly evolving over the last several years. Electric bicycles generate no pollution, are almost silent, and can greatly increase the recreational and transportation options for commuters.â€ť</p>
<p>A number of major states, including California, Florida, and Texas, immediately acted on this opportunity, passing legislation to specifically permit the use of CPSC Compliant electric bicycles on state and municipal roadways. The New England States have generally accepted the Federal rules without passing new laws, choosing to simply harmonize with the Federal definition of electric bicycles as consumer products not subject to the departments of transportation in a manner other than as bicycles. Vermont was the first to do so in 2003. </p>
<p>The Middle Atlantic States, however, have essentially blocked the implementation of the Federal law, either by inaction or outright refusal to harmonize their laws in accordance with the stated will of Congress, continuing to regulate them as motor vehicles, despite the Federal intent, i.e.,</p>
<p>SEC. 38. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, low-speed electric bicycles are consumer products within the meaning of section 3(a)(1) and shall be subject to the Commission regulations published at section 1500.18(a)(12) and part 1512 of title 16, Code of Federal Regulations.<br />
(b) For the purpose of this section, the term `low-speed electric bicycle&#8217; means a two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a motor while ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph.</p>
<p>The solution to reducing consumption of fossil fuels, thereby reducing pollution, cannot rely on a single initiative. It will be found in the sum total of all that can be undertaken.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.660 seconds -->
